The Great Emu War: How Flightless Birds Beat the Australian Army (2024)

Australia is notorious for its historical wildlife management operations of varying success. Since the late 19th century, attempts at containing species to portions of the continent have taken the form of vast exclusion fences, while Australia’s record for intentionally introducing damaging invasive species is spectacular.

Cane toads brought over from Hawaii in 1935 were meant to control native beetles. Instead, the gigantic, toxic toad colonised Queensland and now numbers in the estimated billions, threatening wilderness thousands of kilometres from where it was first released.

Just a few years before the cane toad arrived, another remarkable wildlife control operation took place. In 1932, the Australian military undertook an operation to subdue the tall, flightless bird known as the emu. And they lost.

Here’s the story of Australia’s so-called ‘Great Emu War’.

A formidable foe

Emus are the second largest bird in the world. They’re only found in Australia, having been exterminated by colonists in Tasmania, and have shaggy grey-brown and black plumage with blue-black skin around their neck. They’re highly nomadic creatures, regularly migrating after breeding season, and they’re omnivores, eating fruits, flowers, seeds and shoots, as well as insects and small animals. They have few natural predators.

Emus feature in Indigenous Australian legend as creator spirits that formerly flew over the land. As such they’re represented in astrological mythology: their constellation is formed from dark nebulae between Scorpius and the Southern Cross.

The Great Emu War: How Flightless Birds Beat the Australian Army (1)

“Stalking emu”, circa 1885, attributed to Tommy McRae

Image Credit: Public Domain

Emus occupied a different place in the minds of European settlers in Australia, who worked to make the land feed them. They set out to clear the land and plant wheat. Yet their practices put them at odds with the emu population, for whom the cultivated land, supplied with extra water for livestock, resembled the emu’s preferred habitat of open plains.

Wildlife fences proved effective at keeping out rabbits, dingoes as well as emus, but only so long as they were maintained. By late 1932, they were permeated by holes. As a result, there was nothing to prevent 20,000 emus breaching the perimeter of the wheat-growing region around Campion and Walgoolan in Western Australia.

Emu incursions

The ‘Wheatbelt’, which extends to the north, east and south of Perth, was a diverse ecosystem prior to its clearing in the late 19th century. By 1932, it was populated by increasing numbers of former soldiers, who settled there after World War One to cultivate wheat.

Falling wheat prices in the early 1930s and undelivered government subsidies had made farming difficult. Now they found their lands stricken by emu incursions, which left crops trampled and fences, which otherwise prevented the movement of rabbits, damaged.

Captain Cook has been celebrated, wrongly, as the first European to discover Australia but many now believe it is time to reappraise his legacy particularly in light of the devastating effect it had on the native Aboriginal people of Australia. Professor John Maynard is a Worimi man and Director of Aboriginal History at The Wollotuka Institute. He joins the podcast to explain what Cook's landing at Botany Bay meant for the Aboriginal people at the time and right through the generations to today and into the future. He believes it's time that we had an honest reckoning with Cook's legacy and that this is essential for reconciliation and creating a better way forward.

Listen Now

Mobilising for war

Settlers in the region conveyed their concerns to the Australian government. Given that many settlers were military veterans, they were aware of the capacity of machine guns for sustained fire, and that is what they requested. Minister of Defence, Sir George Pearce, agreed. He ordered the army to cull the emu population.

The ‘Emu War’ proper began in November 1932. Deployed to the combat zone, such as it was, were two soldiers, Sergeant S. McMurray and Gunner J. O’Halloran, and their commander, Major G. P. W. Meredith of the Royal Australian Artillery. They were equipped with two Lewis light machine guns and 10,000 rounds of ammunition. Their objective was the mass extermination of a native species.

The Great Emu War

Already forced to push their campaign from October due to rain scattering the emu across a wider area, the military struggled at first to make effective use of their firepower. On 2 November, locals tried to herd emus towards an ambush, but they split into small groups. On 4 November, an ambush on some 1,000 birds was foiled by a gun jamming.

Over the next few days, the soldiers travelled to locations where emus had been spotted and attempted to complete their objective. To this end, Major Meredith mounted one of the guns on a truck to enable firing at the birds while moving. It was as ineffective as their ambushes. The truck was too slow, and the ride was so rough that the gunner couldn’t fire anyway.

The Great Emu War: How Flightless Birds Beat the Australian Army (3)

An Australian soldier holds a deceased emu during the Emu War

Image Credit: FLHC 4 / Alamy Stock Photo

The invulnerability of tanks

A week in and the campaign was making little headway. An army observer noted of the emu that “each pack seems to have its own leader now: a big black-plumed bird which stands fully six feet high and keeps watch while his mates carry out their work of destruction and warns them of our approach.”

At each encounter, the emu suffered far fewer casualties than expected. By 8 November, between 50 and a few hundred birds had been killed. Major Meredith commended the emus for their ability to withstand gunfire: “If we had a military division with the bullet-carrying capacity of these birds it would face any army in the world. They can face machine guns with the invulnerability of tanks.”

Tactical withdrawal

On 8 November, an embarrassed Sir George Pearce withdrew the troops from the front line. Yet the emu nuisance had not stopped. On 13 November, Meredith returned following requests by farmers and reports that more birds had been killed than had earlier been suggested. Over the next month, the soldiers slayed around 100 emus every week.

When asked if there was a “more humane, if less spectacular” method to undertake the cull, Sir George Pearce replied that only those familiar to emu country could understand the damage done, according to the Melbourne Argus of 19 November 1932.

Jim Burrows OAM, 98, served as a Coastwatcher in the South Pacific during World War Two. He was a radio operator and spent 10 months behind enemy lines in occupied Japanese territory. Jim’s wife Beryl, 97, served in the Royal Australian Air Force as a records keeper, and also features in this episode to tell James what it was like living in Australia while the country was under serious threat of invasion from Japan.

Listen Now

But it was at a huge cost in ammunition, which Meredith claimed was exactly 10 rounds per confirmed kill. The operation may have saved some wheat, but the effectiveness of the cull paled next to the strategy of offering bounties to rifle-wielding farmers.

By contrast, farmers managed to claim 57,034 bounties over six months in 1934.

The campaign was beleaguered by errors and was hardly a success. And worse, as The Sunday Herald reported in 1953, “the incongruity of the whole thing even had the effect, for once, of arousing public sympathy for the emu.”

The Great Emu War: How Flightless Birds Beat the Australian Army (2024)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Aracelis Kilback

Last Updated:

Views: 6324

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (44 voted)

Reviews: 91% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Aracelis Kilback

Birthday: 1994-11-22

Address: Apt. 895 30151 Green Plain, Lake Mariela, RI 98141

Phone: +5992291857476

Job: Legal Officer

Hobby: LARPing, role-playing games, Slacklining, Reading, Inline skating, Brazilian jiu-jitsu, Dance

Introduction: My name is Aracelis Kilback, I am a nice, gentle, agreeable, joyous, attractive, combative, gifted person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.